Home > C Cannot > C# Cannot Assign Method Group To Anonymous Type Property

C# Cannot Assign Method Group To Anonymous Type Property

See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb397733.aspx.   Hope that helps,   --Samir   Wednesday, June 04, 2008 5:03 PM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote  It shouldn't have been returning null, but it I have a try/catch which makes direct computing difficult. –GarbageGuy Mar 3 '10 at 13:42 No, you can't assign a lambda expression to fileName. Erik_F Do you know why this limitation exists? You are a life savior! http://mediastartpage.com/c-cannot/c-cannot-assign-null-to-anonymous-type-property.html

Singular cohomology and birational equivalence Could I work as a Professor in Europe if I only speak English? Sign In·ViewThread·Permalink Re: Little enhancements sgissinger6-Oct-11 6:25 sgissinger6-Oct-11 6:25 Simply because your code will throw a compilation error like this one Error 13 Cannot initialize type 'MyEntityModel.People' with a collection Search Comments Spacing RelaxedCompactTight Layout NormalOpen TopicsOpen AllThread View Per page 102550 First PrevNext I can't run it CysEuGene22-Apr-15 0:21 CysEuGene22-Apr-15 0:21 var tmp = Activator.CreateInstance(Type.GetType(type.ToString())) I got an But, if you try to compile the procedure, you will get the error: Error 1 Cannot convert type 'System.Collections.Generic.List' to 'System.Collections.Generic.List' C:\Development\VS2008\Projects\CodeProject\CodeProject\LinkToSql\DbHandlers.cs 38 23 CodeProject Unfortunately, there is no way the

It is an ending to lots of problems you will face in managing your web application scripts and style she... GetType().GetMethod("Add") returns the MethodInfo object which we will use to call method Add() of the newly created list. Was there no tax before 1913 in the United States? more hot questions question feed lang-cs about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation

You could make the other assembly a friend assembly, but then you'd just feel all dirty inside... 6/27/2012 8:37 AM | James Michael Hare #re: C#/.NET Little Wonders: The Joy of vaswork13-Apr-11 3:05 vaswork13-Apr-11 3:05 [bad English.sorry] As I understand, you should implement that kind of constructor. How can I declare sovereignty from the American government and start my own micro nation? thank you uandimayur13-Apr-11 2:16 uandimayur13-Apr-11 2:16 reduce a lot of work and code too.

Either creating generic extension method or directly through the loop is up to you. (Personally i don't like this solution and i am still waiting for the best one). So what do we mean by intermediate results in a local context?  Well, a classic example would be filtering down results from a LINQ expression.  For example, let’s say we had Suggested title: "Reflections From The Stack" –Adam Rackis Feb 17 '11 at 20:54 12 @Eric: Good answer, but it's slightly misleading to illustrate this as something that's not possible, as http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1550797/c-sharp-anonymous-types-cannot-be-assigned-to-it-is-read-only byte?) var x3 = (int y)=>null; We don't know the return type, but it can't be void.

Ed Guzman4-Apr-12 5:25 Ed Guzman4-Apr-12 5:25 You are welcome Sign In·ViewThread·Permalink vb.net alternative Member 833262419-Oct-11 4:51 Member 833262419-Oct-11 4:51 is there any way to do this in vb.net?? share|improve this answer answered Feb 11 '11 at 4:40 Brian Rasmussen 85.6k25165263 And this is underscored by section 8.5.1 of the language specification. "The initializer expression must have a The returned result is the list of type T. share|improve this answer answered Feb 11 '11 at 4:34 Stephen Cleary 184k22311390 add a comment| up vote 1 down vote The following points are from the MSDN regarding Implicitly Typed Local

Like this:           Func fct = x => (x - 5)*(x - 5);           var query = from i in new[] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, http://forums.asp.net/t/1816762.aspx?Problem+with+Models+in+View The 10'000 year skyscraper White ring of pus forming around branches Looking for a nice example for normal subgroups more hot questions question feed lang-cs about us tour help blog chat The index of all my past little wonders posts can be found here. A number of others have been added in subsequent versions. 'var' is an instruction to the C# compiler to infer the type of a local variable from the type of the

Ask a question Quick access Forums home Browse forums users FAQ Search related threads Remove From My Forums Answered by: CS0828: Cannot assign method group to anonymous type property Data Platform check over here View All Comments No new messages. Why did the best potions master have greasy hair? For example: var foo = new { Square = (Func)(x => x * x) }; Console.WriteLine(foo.Square(2));Whether is is actually useful or not is unclear though, as you can't reference the

Here is a sample code: returnnew[]{ new{Name="FixedValue",ViewModel=(object)newB_FixedValue_EditViewModel()}, new{Name="FixedList",ViewModel=nullasobject}, new{Name="Calculationononevalue",ViewModel=nullasobject}, new{Name="Calculationontwovalues",ViewModel=nullasobject}, new{Name="Loadingavaluefromdatabase",ViewModel=nullasobject}, new{Name="ConditionalValueProvision",ViewModel=nullasobject}, }; Posted by Sam Naseri at 4:36 PM Reactions: Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest Labels: C#, Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions About Us ©2016 C# Corner. Although it's highly subjective, my own view is that it's not worthwhile unless the name of the non-generic type consists of at least eight characters which conveniently excludes the built-in types his comment is here I'm using .NET 3.5. –Marlon Feb 11 '11 at 4:24 8 Why would make the compiler think that's a Func?

This suggests that it would be reasonable to confine the use of 'var' to those cases where the type is obvious because it explicitly appears on the right hand side of The type name is generated by the compiler and is not available at the source code level. Does it really matter what you do?

But we have this problem all the time, and we just use method type inference to deduce the type: Func WorkItOut(Func f) { return f; } ...

select new { ID = job.ID, Description = job.Description, FileName = (job) => { // primitive logic not // worth to become a named method try { return job.Files[0].LocalName); } catch Sign in using Search within: Articles Quick Answers Messages home articles Chapters and Sections> Search Latest Articles Latest Tips/Tricks Top Articles Beginner Articles Technical Blogs Posting/Update Guidelines Article Help Forum Article boolhasPermission=User.Identity.Name==entry.Name; Viewdata["hasPermission"] = hasPermission; ‹ Previous Thread|Next Thread › This site is managed for Microsoft by Neudesic, LLC. | © 2016 Microsoft. Browse other questions tagged c# .net-3.5 delegates lambda implicit-typing or ask your own question.

All contents are copyright of their authors. × Sign up for our free weekly Web Developer Newsletter. 12,573,181 members (138,990 online) Sign in Email Password Forgot your password? Sound arguments. szeeshanali22-Dec-14 22:12 szeeshanali22-Dec-14 22:12 yeah i thought that remapping the entity with the new record set returned by join query is the only way to achieve this goal. weblink See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb397733.aspx.   Hope that helps,   --Samir   Wednesday, June 04, 2008 5:03 PM Reply | Quote All replies 0 Sign in to vote Is it the case that one

Notice that a try/catch isn't necessary. –Mark Seemann Mar 3 '10 at 13:54 Maybe I miss something, but I do not get the point. Making a large file using the terminal Safely adding insecure devices to my home network Teenage daughter refusing to go to school Are “Referendum” and “Plebiscite” the same in the meaning, var xAnon = WorkItOut((int y)=>new { Y = y }); and now method type inference works out what the func type is. Or arrays?

Keep up the great work.--------------------------------------------------Portugal Mortgage BrokerReplyDeleteAdd commentLoad more... Parameter name: Type" I think the problem is when I try to pass the parameter .ToNonAnonymousList(typeof(TBTIPOPERGUNTA)) Any ideia? Although, if you were previously uncommitted, you may not necessarily agree with my 'sensible middle ground' proposal, I hope this article will at least help you to decide on a policy It is key to remember that all of those factors (number, names, types, order of properties) determine the anonymous type.  This is important, because while these two instances share the same

General FAQ Ask a Question Bugs and Suggestions Article Help Forum Site Map Advertise with us About our Advertising Employment Opportunities About Us Articles » Platforms, Frameworks & Libraries » LINQ Comment: Please enter a comment Verification: Remember Me? Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. ← Back to basics: Usage of static members Book review : C# in Depth Second Edition → Jon Skeet  Here's The following example shows an anonymous type being initialized with two properties called Amount and Message.

Again, thanks so much..

© Copyright 2017 mediastartpage.com. All rights reserved.